![]() I don’t think that they are ideal, but let’s see what they can do. Jo and Spike sound like they are the best ticket that the LP has had since 2004 from an issues and philosophical standpoint. Private property owners, or associations of private property, such as in a condominium association, would make these decisions.Įven though I disagree with Spike’s comments and position on immigration, he sounded good on other issues on which I heard him comment. I understand that in an ideal world this function would not be handled by a coercive state, but we do not live in an ideal world, and even if we did live in an ideal world, nobody would be guaranteed access to every piece of property, nor would anyone be able to move into any piece of property which they desire. This does not apply to non-citizens, who must enter through a legal port of entry, and who are not guaranteed entry, or American citizenship, as the criteria for entry and citizenship are set forth the the US Congress. American citizens, as well as the 50 states, plus DC and the federal territories, are all supposed to operate under the US Constitution, and part of the agreement is to have reciprocity among the 50 states and DC and the federal territories, that is that American citizens can travel and move about through the 50 states and DC and US territories. as well as under the “repel an invasion” clause. The US Constitution clearly delegates this function to the federal (or national) government, under the “Law of Nations” clause, as well as under the “naturalization” clause. Reality is that we live in a world that is divided into states (or countries), and every state in the world regulates its borders as well as migration/immigration into that country. Even if we lived in an ananrcho-capitalist society, there’d still be private property borders and various entrance to property policies with which to deal, so his example does not really fly there, unless we were talking about places that were unclaimed. Spike said that traveling or immigrating from another country into the USA should be no different than an American citizen traveling or moving to a different state. ![]() ![]() Like I have said many times before, while government exists the government is acting as a property manager for the existing population, and advocating that there be no limits or restrictions on immigration is an assault on the property rights of the existing population, and is also against preferences of the vast majority of the population. I don’t agree with Spike’s view on immigration, but I don’t agree with Jo Jorgensen’s “let everybody in who wants to come here” position either. I doubt Vermin Supreme would have picked him as his preferred running mate if he was in favor of foreign warmongering. Maybe Spike Cohen used to have those views, but maybe he changed them upon getting more information and reflecting upon them. Whether that was good or bad remains to be seen. Where was Jorgensen during the war? Do we even have any idea if she opposed it or not?” Please don’t tell me you voted for him Andy. ![]() ![]() You’d have to have been really dumb to buy into their bullshit about invading countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, Syria and installing “democracy.” That’s what he believed and now he’s the LP VP nominee. As I see it, once a neo con always a neo con. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |